Money Laundering Regulations 2017 UK AML Guide

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) in 2025: High-Risk Clients and Compliance Requirements

Introduction

In today’s compliance-driven world, failing to identify a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) can cost organizations millions in fines, reputational damage, and even regulatory bans. Financial institutions, remittance businesses, and fintechs are under increasing pressure to monitor and manage high-risk clients, with PEP checks forming a critical part of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) programs.

In recent years, regulators have acted decisively:

  • In 2023, ADM Investor Services International Ltd was fined £6.47 million by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for inadequate AML controls linked to PEP clients.
  • That same year, Guaranty Trust Bank UK Ltd was fined £7.6 million for failing to perform sufficient due diligence on high-risk customers, including PEPs.

The message is clear: PEP screening is not optional—it’s mandatory. This guide explains what PEPs are, why they’re considered high-risk, how businesses should screen and monitor them, and how solutions like Truoco can help you stay compliant while protecting your operations.

What is a Politically Exposed Person (PEP)?

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is an individual who holds—or has held—a prominent public role that could be vulnerable to misuse for corruption, bribery, or money laundering.

According to EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, a PEP includes:

  • Individuals entrusted with national, EU, or international public functions
  • Members of political parties and international organizations
  • Senior officials in government or state-owned enterprises
  • Close family members and close associates (RCAs) of such individuals

The PEP definition has broadened in recent years, covering not only heads of state and ministers but also local officials, judicial leaders, military officers, and senior executives of state-owned enterprises.

Important: Being classified as a PEP does not imply criminal activity. Instead, it signals the need for enhanced scrutiny due to the heightened risk profile.

Why Are PEPs Considered High-Risk?

PEPs are considered high-risk clients because of their access to power, influence, and public resources. The risks associated with PEPs include:

  • Corruption & bribery: Misuse of authority for personal financial gain.
  • Money laundering: Concealing illicit funds through international transfers or investments.
  • Use of intermediaries: Employing family members or associates to obscure true ownership of assets.
  • Global risk exposure: Cross-border connections that can involve high-risk jurisdictions or tax havens.

While PEPs may be legitimate clients, regulators require Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) and ongoing monitoring to minimize potential financial crime exposure.

Types of Politically Exposed Persons

PEPs are typically categorized into three groups:

PEP TypeDescriptionExamples
Domestic PEPsIndividuals holding prominent roles within their own countryMinisters, members of parliament, judges, mayors
Foreign PEPsOfficials from foreign governments or organizationsForeign heads of state, ambassadors, diplomats
International Organization PEPsSenior officials in global organizationsUN, IMF, World Bank executives

Each category carries different levels of risk, with foreign PEPs usually requiring the highest scrutiny.

Common Personas That May Qualify as PEPs

  • Heads of state or government (presidents, prime ministers, monarchs)
  • Senior government officials (cabinet ministers, deputy ministers, heads of departments)
  • Judicial leaders (chief justices, senior judges)
  • High-ranking military officers (generals, admirals)
  • Executives of state-owned enterprises (CEOs, board members in energy, finance, defense sectors)

Note: CEOs of private companies are not PEPs unless the company is state-owned or publicly funded.

PEP Red Flags: Risk Indicators to Watch For

  • Use of intermediaries or shell companies to hide ownership
  • Unexplained wealth or sudden access to large funds
  • Transactions inconsistent with declared income
  • Dealings in high-risk sectors (mining, defense, privatization)
  • Ties to high-corruption jurisdictions or tax havens
  • Complex corporate structures to obscure beneficial ownership
  • Refusal to disclose source of wealth or funds

Why Continuous PEP Monitoring Matters

PEP status isn’t permanent—but it changes frequently. Today’s mid-level politician could become tomorrow’s head of state. Similarly, someone leaving office may remain a risk due to past influence.

That’s why regulators demand ongoing monitoring, not just one-time screening. Businesses must:

  • Integrate PEP checks at onboarding
  • Regularly refresh screening lists
  • Use AI-powered tools to detect evolving risk
  • Cross-check with sanctions, adverse media, and watchlists

Global Regulatory Frameworks on PEPs

United States

  • Foreign PEPs: Subject to enhanced checks under the USA PATRIOT Act (Section 312) and the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
  • Domestic PEPs: FinCEN recommends a risk-based approach.

European Union

  • Governed by the 6th AML Directive and Regulation (EU) 2024/1624.
  • Both domestic and foreign PEPs (plus family and associates) require EDD and continuous monitoring.
  • The Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) will enforce supranational oversight from 2025.

APAC

  • Most countries follow FATF guidance.
  • Example: Singapore (MAS) mandates screening across all PEP categories under MAS Notice 626, with mandatory Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for high-risk individuals.

Best Practices for Working with PEPs

  • Screen against PEP databases during onboarding.
  • Apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for identified PEPs.
  • Obtain senior management approval before establishing relationships.
  • Verify Source of Wealth (SoW) and Source of Funds (SoF).
  • Conduct continuous monitoring with automated alerts.
  • Train compliance teams to detect emerging risks.
  • Report suspicious activity to the relevant authority immediately.

How Truoco Helps You Manage PEP Risk

PEP screening is resource-intensive, especially for remittance companies, MTOs, and fintech operators that process high volumes of international transactions. Manual checks are error-prone and time-consuming, increasing exposure to compliance risks.

Truoco simplifies this challenge by providing:

  • AI-powered PEP and sanctions screening with real-time updates
  • Customizable workflows aligned with your risk appetite
  • Global coverage across watchlists, databases, and adverse media
  • Continuous monitoring dashboards to track PEP status changes
  • Seamless integration into your KYC and transaction monitoring systems

With Truoco, you ensure regulatory compliance, reduced false positives, and operational efficiency—all while safeguarding your business from penalties and reputational damage.

Share this article:

FAQs

What is a Politically Exposed Person (PEP)?

A PEP is an individual who holds or has held a prominent public role, such as a government official, judge, or senior executive in a state-owned enterprise.

Why are PEPs high-risk?

Because of their influence and access to public resources, PEPs are more vulnerable to corruption, bribery, and money laundering.

Do all PEPs require Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)?

Yes. Regulators worldwide require enhanced checks, especially for foreign PEPs, family members, and close associates.

What are common red flags for PEPs?

Unexplained wealth, use of intermediaries, links to tax havens, refusal to disclose wealth, and suspicious transaction patterns.

How often should businesses screen PEPs?

At onboarding and continuously, since PEP status can change over time.

How does Truoco help with PEP compliance?

Truoco automates screening, integrates with global databases, and monitors changes in real time—helping businesses meet AML requirements with confidence.